最近，使用Grok 3和chatGPT建了幾個站，感慨良多。基本的看法，人工智能要代替程序員，目前還只是一個夢。
首先，先説人工智能的優點，態度很好，反應速度極快，寫脚本也很快。也能很快理解你的意圖。對於大的邏輯和已有的架構，可以説是精通。
其次，説説人工智能的缺點。沒有記憶，或者記憶非常差。前面寫，後面忘。更別提前兩天寫的脚本。所有事項忘得一乾二净，而且不願意回頭看，只願意往前冲。
再者，人工智能寫的脚本質量一般，寫全新的脚本還勉强。調試現有脚本就比較查了，小的地方也會出錯，而且會連續出錯。學習能力沒有想象那麽好，同樣的錯誤，幾天都沒有改進。邏輯關係複雜一點的東西，人工智能很難對付，很快就會被被繞進去。而且會把不同的脚本搞混了。
最後，人工智能與人類很相似，出錯先想混過去，或者找客觀理由，還會偷奸耍滑。
所以，人工智能也需要有經驗的管理人員駕馭。
綜合來看，在寫脚本方面，目前chatGPT4强於Grok 3。
（本文版權所有，禁止任何形式的轉載和抄襲）
Recently, I've built a few stations using Grok 3 and chatGPT, and I've had a lot of feelings. My basic opinion is that it is still a dream for AI to replace programmers.
First of all, let's talk about the advantages of AI. It has a very good attitude, it is very responsive, and it can write scripts very quickly. It also understands your intentions very quickly. It's also very good at understanding your intentions. It's also very good at understanding big logic and existing frameworks.
Next, let's talk about the disadvantages of AI. It has no memory, or a very bad memory. You can write something and forget it. Not to mention scripts written two days in advance. It forgets everything and doesn't want to look back, it just wants to go forward.
Also, the quality of scripts written by the AI is mediocre, and writing brand new scripts is not. Debugging existing scripts is a bit more challenging, and errors can occur in small places and all the time. The ability to learn is not as good as I thought, the same mistake, a few days without improvement. The AI has a hard time dealing with things with more complex logic, and it quickly gets caught up in them. And it gets confused with different scripts.
Finally, AI is very similar to humans in that it tries to get away with mistakes or find objective reasons for them, and it can also be sneaky.
Therefore, AI needs to be managed by experienced administrators.
All in all, chatGPT4 is currently better than Grok 3 when it comes to scripting.
(This article is copyrighted, reproduction and plagiarism of any kind are prohibited)